Here

http://www.mscand.dk/article/download/10600/8621r

LikeLike

]]>And, if so, could that open the door for taking Skolem’s ternary logic paradigm more respected and perhaps the proper “paradigm” (which I loosely define as Logic+Set.theory) to prove that PNP must be stated and potentially proved in the aforementioned paradigm?

Skolem wrote this in the 1930’s or so but memory doesn’t serve me well!

LikeLike

]]>LikeLike

]]>